Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

S. C. Loveland Co. v. Eastern States Farmer's Exchange

S. C. Loveland Co. v. E. States Farmer's Exch., 92 F.2d 180 (3d Cir. 1937)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1937-07-26
Topic
general

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The appellant Diamond P. Transportation Company was the owner of the freight barge Superi- or. The appellant Loveland Company, Inc., was the owner of the tug Active and was engaged in towing.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed S. C. Loveland Co. v. Eastern States Farmer's Exchange. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
7 opinions
LOVELAND CO. v. E. STATES FARMER'S EXCHANGE,92 F.2d 180(3rd Cir. 1937)
S.C. LOVELAND CO., Inc., et al. v. EASTERN STATES FARMER'S EXCHANGE.fn*
No. 6422.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
July 26, 1937.
Rehearing Denied October 8, 1937.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; George A. Welsh, Judge.Page 181

Suit in admiralty by the Eastern States Farmer's Exchange against the S.C. Loveland Company, Inc., and another. From an adverse decree, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.
James S. Benn, Jr., and Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Howard M. Long, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, THOMPSON, and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The appellant Diamond P. Transportation Company was the owner of the freight barge Superior. The appellant Loveland Company, Inc., was the owner of the tug Active and was engaged in towing. The appellee, Eastern States Farmer's Exchange, arranged with Loveland Company, Inc., to transport a cargo of 402,730 pounds of superphosphate from Philadelphia to Wilmington. Loveland Company, Inc., procured the barge Superior from Diamond P. Transportation Company for the purpose. During the course of the trip, while in tow of the appellant's tug Active, water seeped into the barge and damaged 253,150 pounds of the superphosphate. The decree of the District Court held Diamond P. Transportation Company primarily liable and Loveland Company, Inc., secondarily liable for damages sustained by the appellee by reason of the destruction of the cargo of superphosphate.

The evidence justified the fact findings that there was floating ice in the river; that both appellants knew this fact; and that the barge was not sheathed to meet this condition. The owner and the charterer of the barge were properly held liable, the former in that it failed to put the barge into seaworthy condition before it allowed it to be chartered and used for the transportation of the cargo, and the latter in that it chartered the barge for use in transporting the appellee's cargo without subjecting it to examination to see whether it was seaworthy and suitable for the purpose for which chartered. The authorities sustain the learned District Judge in holding Diamond P. Transportation Company primarily liable and Loveland Company, Inc., secondarily liable. Pendleton v. Benner Line,246 U.S. 353, 38 S.Ct. 330, 62 L. Ed. 770; Davis v. Dittmar (C.C.A.)6 F.2d 141.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.
  1. Writ of certiorari denied 58 S.Ct. 369, 82 L.Ed. ___. ↩