Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. v. MARTINEZ CASTELLON, 429 Fed.Appx. 435 (5th Cir. 2011)
United States, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Catarino MARTINEZCASTELLON, Defendant-Appellant., 429 F. App'x 435 (5th Cir. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2011-06-21
- Topic
- general
U.S. v. MARTINEZ CASTELLON, 429 Fed.Appx. 435 (5th Cir. 2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Catarino MARTINEZCASTELLON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-40731 Conference Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 21, 2011. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. MARTINEZ CASTELLON, 429 Fed.Appx. 435 (5th Cir. 2011). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
U.S. v. MARTINEZ CASTELLON,429 Fed.Appx. 435(5th Cir. 2011)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Catarino MARTINEZ
CASTELLON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-40731 Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 21, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Catarino Martinez Castellon, Pecos, TX, pro se.
Catarino Martinez Castellon, Pecos, TX, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 5:09-CR-2872-1.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Catarino Martinez Castellon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance withAnders v. California,386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493(1967), andUnited States v. Flores,632 F.3d 229(5th Cir. 2011). Martinez Castellon has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Martinez Castellon's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.See5TH CIR. R. 42.2.