Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
I4I LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. MICROSOFT CORP., 343 Fed.Appx. 619 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
I4I Ltd. P’ship & Infrastructures for Info. Inc.,Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICROSOFT Corp., Defendant-Appellant., 343 F. App'x 619 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-09-03
- Topic
- general
I4I LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. MICROSOFT CORP., 343 Fed.Appx. 619 (Fed. Cir. 2009) I4I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Infrastructures for Information Inc.,Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed I4I LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. MICROSOFT CORP., 343 Fed.Appx. 619 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
I4I LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. MICROSOFT CORP.,343 Fed.Appx. 619(Fed. Cir. 2009)
I4I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Infrastructures for Information Inc.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2009-1504.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
September 3, 2009.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-113, Leonard Davis, Judge.
Donald R. Dunner, Don O. Burley, Kara F. Stoll, Jason W. Melvin, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Washington, DC, Erik R. Puknys, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Matthew D. Powers, Weil, Gotshal Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, Kevin Sean Kudlac, Amber Hatfield Rovner, Weil, Gotshal Manges LLP, Austin, TX, Isabella E. Fu, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Matthew D. McGill, Minodora D. Vancea, Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Matthew D. Powers, Weil, Gotshal Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, Kevin Sean Kudlac, Amber Hatfield Rovner, Weil, Gotshal Manges LLP, Austin, TX, Isabella E. Fu, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Matthew D. McGill, Minodora D. Vancea, Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Microsoft Corporation moves for a stay, pending appeal, of the district court's injunction. The appellees oppose. Microsoft replies.
Without prejudicing the ultimate determination of this case by the merits panel, the court determines based upon the motion papers submitted that Microsoft has met its burden to obtain a stay of the injunction.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩