DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, 101 Ill.2d 551 (1984)Supreme Court of Illinois. 1984. (59912) People v. Wick ............................................ Allowed. (59789) People v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, 101 Ill.2d 551 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL,101 Ill.2d 551(1984)
Supreme Court of Illinois.
(59912) People v. Wick ............................................ Allowed. (59789) People v. Williams, Martin Ray ............................. Denied. (59959) People v. Williams, Robert ................................. Denied. (59891) People v. Williams, Tyrone ................................. Denied. (59882) People v. Wright, George ................................... Denied. (59937) People v. Wright, Roy ...................................... Denied. (59864) People v. Ziporyn ......................................... Allowed. (59949) Peopleex rel.First National Bank v. City of North Chicago ............................................ Denied. (60427) Peopleex rel.Jones v. Cartledge ....................... Dismissed. (59941) Peopleex rel.Palmer v. Conover ........................... Denied. (60008) Postel v. Board of Managers ................................ Denied. (59987) Radford v. Soward Investments, Inc. ........................ Denied. (59816) Rigsby v. Greater Rockford Airport ......................... Denied. (59803) Runyon v. Rich ............................................. Denied. (60011) Saballus v. Timke .......................................... Denied. (59913) Schaumberg, Village of v. Kingsport Village, Inc. .......... Denied. (60039) Scott v. Board of Review .................................. Allowed. (60023) Sharp v. Board of Fire Police Commissioners .............. Denied. (59970) Sheber v. Sheber ........................................... Denied. (59861) Shwachman v. Karp .......................................... Denied. (59954) Sidwell v. Casey National Bank ............................. Denied. (60038) Sieman v. Holy Cross Hospital ............................. Allowed. (59879) Simmons v. Union Electric Co. ............................. Allowed. (59804) Smith v. Smith ............................................. Denied. (60024) Sommer v. Hodgson .......................................... Denied. (59929) Tanner v. Board of Trustees ................................ Denied. (59915) Tonarelli v. Gibbons ....................................... Denied. (59857) Trautman v. Knights of Columbus ............................ Denied. (58380) Trotter v. Moore ............................... Allowed with order.
The petition for leave to appeal is allowed. In the exercise of this court's supervisory jurisdiction, the judgment of the Appellate Court, Second District (113 Ill. App.3d 1011), is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court of Winnebago County for further proceedings consistent with the decision inBullard v. Barnes(1984),102 Ill.2d 505.
(59931) Vitiritti v. West Bend Co. ................................. Denied. (60114) Vogel v. Dawdy ............................................ Allowed.Page 552