Opinion · New York Supreme Court
Vredenbergh v. Hallett
Vredenbergh v. Hallett, 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1799)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1799-01-15
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The plaintiff must be allowed the interest on the amount of the verdict, until the time of taxing the costs in this action, and the same must be taxed, together with the costs. * In all actions, founded on contracts carrying interest, and *30delayed under similar circumstances, the . like interest may,, in like manner, be taxed.*(a) Lord v. The Mayor &c. of New York, 3 Hill, 430, n. (a) and references. People v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vredenbergh v. Hallett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The plaintiff must be allowed the interest on the amount of the verdict, until the time of taxing the costs in this action, and the same must be taxed, together with the costs. *
In all actions, founded on contracts carrying interest, and
Lord v. The Mayor &c. of New York, 3 Hill, 430, n. (a) and references. People v. Gaine, 1 Johns. R. 343. See also Bissel v. Hopkins, 4 Cowen, 53, but is otherwise when the plaintiff has been the cause of delay. Williams v. Smith, 2 Caines’ R. 253.