Opinion · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Jefferson County Fiscal Court v. Trager
Jefferson County Fiscal Court v. Trager, 300 Ky. 606 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) 1945)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky
- Date
- 1945-10-16
- Topic
- general
Opinion op the Court by Yan Sant, Commissioner Remanding cause. *607 The action was instituted under Sections 639a — 1 to 639a — 12, inclusive, of the Civil Code of Practice, wherein appellants and appellee seek a declaration of their respective rights under certain provisions of the Revised Statutes. Section 639a — 9, supra, provides that all persons who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration shall be made parties when declaratory relief is sought; and the Attorney General of the State shall be served with a copy of. the pleadings in a proceeding which involves the validity of a Statute. Although the Commonwealth will be vitally affected by a decision of the questions presented, neither it nor any of its departments has been made a party to the suit; and, although the proceeding involves the validity of several Statutes, the Attorney General has not been served with a copy of the pleadings. For these reasons, the Chancellor should have refused to render a decision. Commonwealth ex rel.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jefferson County Fiscal Court v. Trager. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
Opinion op the Court by
Yan Sant, CommissionerRemanding cause.
*607 The action was instituted under Sections 639a — 1 to 639a — 12, inclusive, of the Civil Code of Practice, wherein appellants and appellee seek a declaration of their respective rights under certain provisions of the Revised Statutes. Section 639a — 9, supra, provides that all persons who have or claim any interest which would be affected by the declaration shall be made parties when declaratory relief is sought; and the Attorney General of the State shall be served with a copy of. the pleadings in a proceeding which involves the validity of a Statute. Although the Commonwealth will be vitally affected by a decision of the questions presented, neither it nor any of its departments has been made a party to the suit; and, although the proceeding involves the validity of several Statutes, the Attorney General has not been served with a copy of the pleadings. For these reasons, the Chancellor should have refused to render a decision. Commonwealth ex rel. Meredith, Atty. Gen., v. Reeves, Commissioner of Revenue et al., 289 Ky. 73, 157 S. W. 2d 751.
The cause is remanded, with directions that the judgment be set aside but without prejudice to the right of the parties to amend and proceed in the manner above indicated.