Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley
Parker v. Citizens Comm. for the Hudson Valley, 400 U.S. 949 (1970)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1970-12-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- Refusal to bargain, loss of benefits that might have been gained by employees in negotiated agreement
- Corps required to prepare project-wide EIS now because both Congress and the Secretary of Transportation later will have to approve other portions of the state expressway project
- in trial for assaulting a police officer, evidence that defendant's driver's license had been revoked was admissible to show motive for resistance when officer stopped defendant and asked to see his license
- sections 9 & 10 of the Refuse Act, 33 U.S.C. §§401 & 403
- district court has power to set aside agency action in excess of statutory authority
- statement that some of the participants in the crime were at a house in Jersey City didn’t incriminate Ba-glino, who testified, in response to a question from his own lawyer, that he lived in Jersey City
- similar provision under the Department of Transportation Act
- enlarging reinstatement rights of economic strikers
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 192 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr.. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Black-, mun are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.Reported below: 425 F. 2d 97.