Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court

Woodward v. Chester

Woodward v. Chester, 42 Mich. 461 (Mich. 1880)

Type
Opinion
Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Michigan
Date
1880-01-13
Topic
general

Per Curiam. A record bas been furnished us in this case, and also a brief on the part of the defendants. The complainant has not sent in any brief, nor has he appeared either in person or by counsel. We cannot under such circumstances examine the case on the merits, and it follows that the decree must be affirmed with costs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Woodward v. Chester. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

A record bas been furnished us in this case, and also a brief on the part of the defendants. The complainant has not sent in any brief, nor has he appeared either in person or by counsel.

We cannot under such circumstances examine the case on the merits, and it follows that the decree must be affirmed with costs.