Opinion · Nylaw New York

SCHWENDNER v. SCHNEIDER, 237 N.Y. 542 (1923)

JOHN SCHWENDNER, Respondent, v. MINNIE SCHNEIDER, as Adm’r, Adm’x ofthe Est. of FRED SCHNEIDER, Deceased, Defendant, & LA MURA CONTRACTINGCOMPANY, Appellant., 237 N.Y. 542 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1923)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1923-12-27
Topic: general

SCHWENDNER v. SCHNEIDER, 237 N.Y. 542 (1923) JOHN SCHWENDNER, Respondent, v. MINNIE SCHNEIDER, as Administratrix ofthe Estate of FRED SCHNEIDER, Deceased, Defendant, and LA MURA CONTRACTINGCOMPANY, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 22, 1923 Decided December 27, 1923 Bertrand L. Pettigrew, Walter L. Glenney and Everett W.Bovard for appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHWENDNER v. SCHNEIDER, 237 N.Y. 542 (1923). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHWENDNERv. SCHNEIDER,237 N.Y. 542(1923)

JOHN SCHWENDNER, Respondent,v. MINNIE SCHNEIDER, as Administratrix of

the Estate of FRED SCHNEIDER, Deceased, Defendant, and LA MURA CONTRACTING

COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 22, 1923

Decided December 27, 1923

Bertrand L. Pettigrew, Walter L. GlenneyandEverett W.Bovardfor appellant.Clarence E. Thornallfor respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.