Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 576 (1991)
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 101 N.C. App. 576 (1991), 101 N.C. App. 576 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1991-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 576 (1991)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 5 February 1991 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] STATE v. PENDRY Mecklenburg No Error No. 9026SC880 (89CRS45231) STATE v. PICKETT New Hanover No Error No. 905SC117 (89CRS16109) STATE v. PIERCE Currituck No Error No. 901SC373 (88CRS1429) STATE v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 576 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,101 N.C. App. 576(1991)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 5 February 1991
STATE v. PENDRY Mecklenburg No Error No. 9026SC880 (89CRS45231)
STATE v. PICKETT New Hanover No Error No. 905SC117 (89CRS16109)
STATE v. PIERCE Currituck No Error No. 901SC373 (88CRS1429)
STATE v. QUINN Gaston No Error No. 9027SC820 (89CRS16690) (89CRS16691) (89CRS16692) (89CRS16693) (89CRS16694) (89CRS16695)
STATE v. RODMAN Beaufort No Error No. 902SC803 (86CRS8815) (88CRS8818)
STATE v. RUTLEDGE Wake Affirmed No. 9010SC1028 (85CRS78958) (85CRS78959) (89CRS80779) (89CRS80780)
STATE v. SIMPSON Alamance No Error No. 9015SC735 (89CRS11672)
STATE v. TRAMMELL Haywood No Error No. 9030SC807 (89CRS3229)
STATE v. VEGA Guilford No Error No. 9018SC507 (88CRS57276) (88CRS57277) (89CRS57278)
STATE v. YOUNG Mecklenburg No Error No. 9026SC799 (89CRS27799)
TABANO v. MIDGETT Dare Dismissed No. 901SC826 (87CVS446)
VANNOY v. HIATT Ashe Affirmed No. 8923SC1211 (88CVS210)
VINSON v. SUMMERLIN Carteret Affirmed No. 903DC186 (88CVD1069)
WARD v. ROY H. PARK Pitt Affirmed BROADCASTING CO. (86CVS2243) No. 903SC179Page 577
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩