Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 722 (1991)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 101 N.C. App. 722 (1991), 101 N.C. App. 722 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1991-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 722 (1991)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 19 February 1991 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 19 FEBRUARY 1991 ADVANCE TEXTILE Gaston Affirmed PRODUCTS, INC. v. (89CVS2695) HOLLIFIELD No. 9027SC291 BOWMAN v. WILLIAMSON Randolph On plaintiff's No. 8919SC1315 (88CVS250) appeal no error. On defendant's appeal no error.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 101 N.C. App. 722 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,101 N.C. App. 722(1991)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 19 February 1991


FILED 19 FEBRUARY 1991

ADVANCE TEXTILE Gaston Affirmed PRODUCTS, INC. v. (89CVS2695) HOLLIFIELD No. 9027SC291

BOWMAN v. WILLIAMSON Randolph On plaintiff's No. 8919SC1315 (88CVS250) appeal no error. On defendant's appeal no error.

BRAREN v. BRAREN Buncombe Affirmed No. 9028DC638 (88CVD2344) (89CVD2566)

CATES v. WILSON Guilford New Trial No. 8918SC627 (81CVS6664)

GAINES v. N.C. DEPT. OF Ind. Comm. Affirmed TRANSPORTATION (TA-9261) No. 9010IC707 (TA-9262)

IN RE BEYER Watauga Affirmed No. 9024DC685 (85J42)

IN RE FORNEY Cabarrus Affirmed No. 9019DC704 (86J19)

LINEBURG v. WATSON Wake No Error No. 9010SC708 (88CVS3862)

SANTORO v. DENNING Wayne Appeal No. 908SC602 (89CVS484) Dismissed

STATE v. BARRETT Forsyth No Error No. 9021SC961 (89CRS33657)

STATE v. BARRETT Forsyth No Error No. 9021SC580 (89CRS17738)

STATE v. BUSH Union No Error No. 9020SC614 (89CRS8552)

STATE v. CLEMONTS Northampton Affirmed No. 906SC666 (89CRS2111) (89CRS2111A)

STATE v. COPELAND Rowan Affirmed No. 9019SC740 (89CRS012601) (89CRS012603) (89CRS012605) (89CRS012466)Page 723
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩