Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 112 N.C. App. 544 (1993)

112 N.C. App. 544

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1993-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 112 N.C. App. 544 (1993)North Carolina Court of Appeals (Filed 21 September 1993) [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] PARKER v. PINEWOOD Onslow Affirmed MANOR HOMES (91CVS611) No. 934SC198 PINNIX v. CITY OF Guilford Affirmed HIGH POINT (91CVS2683) No. 9318SC306 RUSSELL v. CHAMPION Haywood Dismissed INTERNATIONAL (92CVS713) No. 9330SC588 SAMONAS v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 112 N.C. App. 544 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,112 N.C. App. 544(1993)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
(Filed 21 September 1993)


PARKER v. PINEWOOD Onslow Affirmed MANOR HOMES (91CVS611) No. 934SC198

PINNIX v. CITY OF Guilford Affirmed HIGH POINT (91CVS2683) No. 9318SC306

RUSSELL v. CHAMPION Haywood Dismissed INTERNATIONAL (92CVS713) No. 9330SC588

SAMONAS v. CRUMLEY Carteret Affirmed No. 933SC554 (90CVS870)

SANDAVIS PROPERTIES, Moore Dismissed INC. v. McGRAW (91CVD00820) No. 9220DC1095

SHOOK v. SHOOK McDowell Vacated No. 9329DC563 (91CVD257)

STATE v. ANDERSON Union No Error No. 9320SC545 (92CRS04403) (92CRS11397) (92CRS11398) (93CRS00483)

STATE v. ANDERSON Union No Error No. 9320SC547 (93CRS0482) (93CRS0484) (93CRS1061)

STATE v. BARRETT Lenoir No Error No. 928SC428 (91CRS6588) (91CRS6589) (91CRS6590)

STATE v. BAUCOM Wayne No Error No. 928SC40 (89CRS13971) (89CRS13975) (89CRS13978)

STATE v. BEST Buncombe Dismissed No. 9328SC475 (92CRS2351) (92CRS2352) (92CRS2353) (92CRS2354) (92CRS2355) (92CRS3493) (92CRS5348) (92CRS5349) (92CRS5350) (92CRS5351)Page 545(92CRS5352) (92CRS5353) (92CRS5354) (92CRS5355) (92CRS5357) (92CRS5358) (92CRS54742) (92CRS54743) (92CRS54744) (92CRS54745)
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩