Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 131 N.C. App. 554 (1998)
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 131 N.C. App. 554 (1998), 131 N.C. App. 554 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1998-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 131 N.C. App. 554 (1998)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 17 November 1998 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 17 NOVEMBER 1998 BROWN v. TERRY Durham Affirmed No. 97-1206 (96CVS2003) CLIFTON v. CLIFTON Johnston Appeal Dismissed No. 98-10 (95CVS1279) GILL v. PHIFFER Wake No Error No. 97-1243 (96CVS2140) IN RE ESTATE OF HODGIN Guilford Dismissed No. 98-720 (97E802) IN RE MANLEY Surry Affirmed No. 98-468 (94J68A) (96J71A) IN RE WILL OF SIMMONS Surry Affirmed No. 98-178 (96CVS495) KEITH v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS, 131 N.C. App. 554 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CLIFTON v. CLIFTON Johnston Appeal Dismissed No. 98-10 (95CVS1279)
GILL v. PHIFFER Wake No Error No. 97-1243 (96CVS2140)
IN RE ESTATE OF HODGIN Guilford Dismissed No. 98-720 (97E802)
IN RE MANLEY Surry Affirmed No. 98-468 (94J68A) (96J71A)
IN RE WILL OF SIMMONS Surry Affirmed No. 98-178 (96CVS495)
KEITH v. FRIEND Johnston Dismissed No. 98-318 (96CVS1821)
LOCKLEAR v. STEDMAN CORP. Ind. Comm. Affirmed No. 98-192 (236623)
MORRIS v. COBLE Randolph Affirmed No. 98-202 (95CVS596)
MORRIS v. U.S. Ind. Comm. Affirmed AIRWAYS, INC. (364903) No. 97-1449
MOSLEY v. BLYTHE Ind. Comm. Affirmed EQUIP. CO. (548832) No. 98-455
RUSH v. EMPLOYERS INS. Henderson Affirmed OF WAUSAU (97CVS174) No. 97-937
STATE v. BASS Guilford No Error No. 98-498 (97CRS58290)
STATE v. BROWN Hertford No Error No. 98-656 (96CRS4424)
STATE v. BROWN Wake No Error No. 98-641 (97CRS41891)
STATE v. BURGESS Forsyth No Error No. 97-1463 (96CRS41194) (96CRS41277) (97CRS8169)Page 555
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩