Opinion · Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Bray v. State Board of Education

Bray v. State Bd. of Educ., 21 N.C. App. 225 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Date: 1974-04-03
Topic: employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

VAUGHN, Judge. Plaintiff’s action must fail for a number of reasons. We need to mention only one. It is perfectly clear that the General Assembly did not, in 1971, appropriate funds for the payments to which plaintiff contends she is entitled, and, for that reason, the action was properly dismissed. Moreover, notwithstanding the language found in its caption, when the act in question is construed contextually it fails to provide the benefits contended for by plaintiff.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bray v. State Board of Education. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiff’s action must fail for a number of reasons. We need to mention only one. It is perfectly clear that the General Assembly did not, in 1971, appropriate funds for the payments to which plaintiff contends she is entitled, and, for that reason, the action was properly dismissed. Moreover, notwithstanding the language found in its caption, when the act in question is construed contextually it fails to provide the benefits contended for by plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.