Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 54 N.C. App. 365 (1981)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 54 N.C. App. 365 (1981), 54 N.C. App. 365 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1981-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 54 N.C. App. 365 (1981)North Carolina Court of Appeals 1981 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 20 OCTOBER 1981 DUKE POWER v. WINEBARGER Wilkes No Error No. 8123SC149 (76SP142) IN RE LaSALLE Cumberland Affirmed No. 8112DC249 (79J487) IN RE LAUTNER Buncombe Affirmed No. 8128DC122 (80SP155) IN RE WALKER Cumberland Reversed No. 8112DC376 (73J193) PITTMAN v. PITTMAN Orange Affirmed in Part, No. 8115DC139 (76CVD369) Reversed Remanded in Part STATE v. CAGLE Buncombe No Error No. 8128SC358 (80CRS0992) STATE v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 54 N.C. App. 365 (1981). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,54 N.C. App. 365(1981)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
1981


FILED 20 OCTOBER 1981

DUKE POWER v. WINEBARGER Wilkes No Error No. 8123SC149 (76SP142)

IN RE LaSALLE Cumberland Affirmed No. 8112DC249 (79J487)

IN RE LAUTNER Buncombe Affirmed No. 8128DC122 (80SP155)

IN RE WALKER Cumberland Reversed No. 8112DC376 (73J193)

PITTMAN v. PITTMAN Orange Affirmed in Part, No. 8115DC139 (76CVD369) Reversed Remanded in Part

STATE v. CAGLE Buncombe No Error No. 8128SC358 (80CRS0992)

STATE v. CARTER Durham No Error No. 8114SC166 (80CRS12661)

STATE v. CARVER COOPER Haywood Judgment is No. 8130SC402 (80CRS3371) Arrested — Cooper (80CRS3372) No Error — Carver

STATE v. LOCKAMY New Hanover No Error No. 815SC242 (80CRS13288) (80CRS13290)

STATE v. LOFTON Wayne No Error No 818SC283 (80CRS6404)

STATE v. MOORE Richmond No Error No. 8120SC232 (80CRS5538)

STATE v. SMITH Craven No Error No. 813SC367 (80CR11577)Page 366
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩