Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 84 N.C. App. 567 (1987)
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 84 N.C. App. 567 (1987), 84 N.C. App. 567 (N.C. Ct. App. 1987)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1987-01-01
- Topic
- general
CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 84 N.C. App. 567 (1987)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 3 March 1987 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] FILED 3 MARCH 1987 ARCHER v. TRI-CITY Guilford Reversed and No. 8618SC566 (84CVS4174) remanded for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion ARCHER CONSTRUCTION v. Buncombe Affirmed BRUMMER (85CVS1947) No. 8628DC872 BLISS v. CYRIL BATH Union Appeal No. 8620SC886 (85CVS761) Dismissed CHATHAM MOTORS v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 84 N.C. App. 567 (1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
FILED 3 MARCH 1987
ARCHER v. TRI-CITY Guilford Reversed and No. 8618SC566 (84CVS4174) remanded for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion
ARCHER CONSTRUCTION v. Buncombe Affirmed BRUMMER (85CVS1947) No. 8628DC872
BLISS v. CYRIL BATH Union Appeal No. 8620SC886 (85CVS761) Dismissed
CHATHAM MOTORS v. PURVIS Chatham Affirmed No. 8615DC934 (85CVD421)
HAMRICK v. PUTT-PUTT Rutherford New Trial No. 8629SC231 (83CVS372)
HORTON v. RIVENBARK Mecklenburg Affirmed No. 8626SC479 (85CVS10970)
HOUGH v. MARTIN Union No error No. 8620SC945 (84CVS0040)
IN RE BRACEY Durham Affirmed No. 8614DC829 (83J96)
IN RE SWANSON Transylvania Affirmed No. 8629DC749 (86J4)
JONES v. HINTON Chatham Appeal No. 8615SC871 (85CVS338) Dismissed
MATTER OF WILSON Person Affirmed No. 869DC958 (86J14)
SHULAR v. HAMMONDS Gaston Appeal No. 8627SC901 (86CVS900) Dismissed
SIMPSON v. CHARLOTTE PIPE Mecklenburg Affirmed No. 8626SC522 (85CVS11959)
SMITH v. LYON Durham Affirmed No. 8614SC471 (85CVS2009)
STATE v. AMANCHUKWA Pasquotank The appeal as to No. 861SC816 (86CRS1) the misdemeanor count is dismissed; as to the felony conviction, we find no errorPage 568
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩