Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Eastman v. Commissioners of Burke County
Eastman v. Comm’rs of Burke County, 119 N.C. 505 (N.C. 1896)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1896-09-05
- Topic
- general
EaiRCloth, C. J. : This is an action, for possession of a part of the court-house square- in Burke county. The plaintiff made a motion to have the cause removed to another county, on the ground that the subject of the action is county property, and that every juror in the county was interested as a taxpayer. The same principle was considered in Johnson v. Rankin, 70 N.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eastman v. Commissioners of Burke County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
This is an action, for possession of a part of the court-house square- in Burke county. The plaintiff made a motion to have the cause removed to another county, on the ground that the subject of the action is county property, and that every juror in the county was interested as a taxpayer.
The same principle was considered in Johnson v. Rankin, 70 N. C., 550, and the motion was overruled. No judge or juror can serve in an action in which lie is interested, but the interest ofa man because of his residence in a county or town is too remote aud indirect. Such a rule would disqualify every judge or justice of the peace to try an action in the county or town in which he resided.
Affirmed.
Furches, J., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of this case.