Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Arnold v. Hardy.
131 N.C. 113
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1902-10-07
- Topic
- general
Pee OuetaM. For the reasons given in the case of Arnold v. Dennis, at this, term of the Court, and also for the additional reason that it does not appear that F. H. Thomas, the devisee, in Item 8 of the will (a construction of which seems to' be the purpose of the appeal), died without issue, the most material part of the case, this case must go back for a new *114 trial.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arnold v. Hardy.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
For the reasons given in the case of Arnold v. Dennis, at this, term of the Court, and also for the additional reason that it does not appear that F. H. Thomas, the devisee, in Item 8 of the will (a construction of which seems to' be the purpose of the appeal), died without issue, the most material part of the case, this case must go back for a new *114 trial. It is said in the statement of the case that “plaintiffs claim that he died without issue/’ but surely that must be found as a fact before it can be expected that we should malee a decision in the matter. The case was made up by counsel.
New Trial.