Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Winstead v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
158 N.C. 591
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1912-03-13
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam:. "We have examined the fourteen assignments of error in the record of this ease, and are of the opinion that his Honor committed no substantial error in submitting the case involved to the jury. We think his Honor followed the well-settled decisions of this Court. We are of opinion that no reversible error has been committed which would warrant us in directing a new trial. No error.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Winstead v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"We have examined the fourteen assignments of error in the record of this ease, and are of the opinion that his Honor committed no substantial error in submitting the case involved to the jury. We think his Honor followed the well-settled decisions of this Court. We are of opinion that no reversible error has been committed which would warrant us in directing a new trial.
No error.