Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bechtel v. . Weaver
Bechtel v. . Weaver, 202 N.C. 856 (N.C. 1932)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1932-06-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that, “as the sale which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin has already taken place, there is nothing now to restrain, and the action was properly dismissed”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bechtel v. . Weaver. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375, 160 S. E., 357), still the correct result has been reached in another way, and the judgment will not be disturbed. Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32. “A new trial will not he granted when the action of the trial judge, even if erroneous, could by no possibility injure the appellant.” Butts v. Screws, 95 N. C., 215.
This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to consider defendants’ appeal.
Affirmed.