Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
In Re Clark
In Re Clark, 314 N.C. 665 (N.C. 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1985-10-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- no due diligence where petitioner in a termination of parental rights case knew respondent’s name and his county of residence, but had not checked the public records to determine his location; rather petitioner relied solely on information supplied by the mother of respondent’s child
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Clark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
335 S.E.2d 322 (1985)
In re Daniel James CLARK.
No. 486P85.Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 1, 1985.Meyressa H. Schoonmaker, Winston-Salem, for petitioner (Clark).
Dan S. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for respondent.
Clark's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed. Petition Denied.