Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Stone v. Martin
320 N.C. 638
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1987-09-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “Fraud exists when there is a breach of a fiduciary duty.”
- "[o]ur decision in the previous appeal constitutes the law of the case"
- punitive damages available for breach of fiduciary duty
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stone v. Martin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
Petition by defendants (Martin and Sanderford) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 September 1987. Notice of appeal by defendants (Martin and Sanderford) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 dismissed 3 September 1987.