Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 343 N.C. 128 (1996)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 343 N.C. 128 (1996), 343 N.C. 128 (N.C. 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1996-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 343 N.C. 128 (1996)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1996 PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW UNDER G.S. 7A-31 WATKINS v. WATKINS No. 487A95 Case below: 120 N.C. App. 475 Notice of appeal filed Pro Se by Kim U. Kim (formerly known as Kim Watkins) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 3 April 1996. YOUNG v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 343 N.C. 128 (1996). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,343 N.C. 128(1996)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1996
WATKINS v. WATKINS
No. 487A95
Case below:120 N.C. App. 475
Notice of appeal filed Pro Se by Kim U. Kim (formerly known as Kim Watkins) pursuant to G.S.7A-30(substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 3 April 1996.
YOUNG v. YOUNG
No. 101P96
Case below:121 N.C. App. 399
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 3 April 1996.