Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 227 (1998)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 349 N.C. 227 (1998), 349 N.C. 227 (N.C. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1998-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 227 (1998)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1998 DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW UNDER G.S. 7A-31 AAA SIGNS OF BURLINGTON v. CITY OF BURLINGTON BD. OF ADJUST. No. 301P98 Case below: 130 N.C. App. 149 (7 July 1998) Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 October 1998.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 349 N.C. 227 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,349 N.C. 227(1998)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1998
AAA SIGNS OF BURLINGTON v. CITY OF BURLINGTON BD. OF ADJUST.
No. 301P98
Case below:130 N.C. App. 149(7 July 1998)
Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 October 1998.
AUSTIN v. LARGE ANIMAL MEDICINE AND SURGERY
No. 262P98
Case below:129 N.C. App. 646(2 June 1998)
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 30 September 1998.
BALDRIDGE v. HUDSON
No. 342P98
Case below:129 N.C. App. 643(19 May 1998)
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 October 1998.
BARBER v. CONSTIEN
No. 373P98
Case below:130 N.C. App. 380(4 August 1998)
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 October 1998.
BOYD v. DRUM
No. 261A98
Case below:129 N.C. App. 586(2 June 1998)
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 October 1998.Page 228