Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Knight Publ’g Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 351 N.C. 98 (N.C. 1999)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1999-09-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- remanding for modification of the Court of Appeals’ opinion because the “majority holding ... is found in Judge Walker’s concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Knight Publishing Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
ORDER
The majority holding in Knight Publ’g Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 131 N.C. App. 257, 506 S.E.2d 728 (1998), disc. rev. denied, 350 N.C. 309, — S.E.2d — (1999), is found in Judge Walker’s concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion. This opinion format is unacceptable. See Jones v. Asheville Radiological Group, 350 N.C. 654, 517 S.E.2d 380 (1999).
Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to modify its opinion.
By the Court in Conference, this the 27th day of September, 1999.
Wainwright, J.For the Court