Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Barnett

State v. Barnett, 353 N.C. 527 (N.C. 2001)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2001-06-07
Topic
bankruptcy

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 June 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 7 June 2001.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Barnett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 June 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 7 June 2001.