Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re J.W.

360 N.C. 361

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2006-03-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that a court "may take judicial notice of earlier proceedings in the same cause[,] . . . [and] prior [orders] are admissible, although not determinative in a parental rights proceeding"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re J.W.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions
IN THE MATTER OF J.W.,360 N.C. 361(2006)
IN THE MATTER OF J.W. AND K.W.
No. 592A05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Filed March 3, 2006.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,173 N.C. App. ___,619 S.E.2d 534(2005), affirming a judgment terminating respondent's parental rights entered 12 March 2004 by Judge Addie H. Rawls in District Court, Harnett County. On 1 December 2005, the Supreme Court allowed respondent's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 2006.
E. Marshall Woodall for petitioner-appellee Harnett CountyDepartment of Social Services.Peter Wood for respondent-appellant mother.Elizabeth Myrick Boone for appellee Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.Page 362