Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.
Twenty-Five E. 40th St. Rest. Corp. v. Forbes, Inc., 30 N.Y.2d 595 (New York Court of Appeals 1972)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1972-03-15
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- denial of injunction against unfavorable rating in restaurant guide
- magazine article concerning a restaurant's food
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
The plaintiff has failed to state any evidentiary facts, warranting a trial, to support its allegation that the defendant was motivated by malice in publishing its critique of the plaintiff’s restaurant. (See, e.g., Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U. S. 29; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254; Frink v. McEldowney, 29 N Y 2d 720; Kent v. City of Buffalo, 29 N Y 2d 818.)