Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Bollard v. Engel
Matter of Bollard v. Engel, 278 N.Y. 463 (New York Court of Appeals 1938)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1938-10-18
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. We think the evidence warranted tfie finding that the employment was not interrupted while the deceased was returning from supper on the occasion in question, (Cf. Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 10; Matter of Goldman v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of Bollard v. Engel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 33 opinions
We think the evidence warranted tfie finding that the employment was not interrupted while the deceased was returning from supper on the occasion in question, (Cf. Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 10; Matter of Goldman v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 276 N. Y. 582.) The employer’s first report of injury was not without probative force merely because it was not made upon personal knowledge (Gangi v. Fradus, 227 N. Y. 452, 456, 457).
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Crane, Ch, J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubrs, Loeghran, Finch and Rjkpey, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.