Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

Stewart v. Kennedy

Stewart v. Kennedy, 70 Ohio St. 3d 536 (Ohio 1994)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Date: 1994-10-12
Topic: litigation

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Ault. A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stewart v. Kennedy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at

70 Ohio St.3d 536

.]




              STEWART, APPELLANT v. KENNEDY ET AL., APPELLEES.
                    [Cite as Stewart v. Kennedy,

1994-Ohio-47

.]
Statutes of limitations—Discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations where
          victim of childhood sexual abuse represses memories of that abuse until a
          later time—One-year statute of limitations period for sexual abuse begins
          to run, when.
  (No. 93-2038—Submitted September 14, 1994—Decided October 12, 1994.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-920152.
                                  __________________
          Thomas A. Gelwicks, for appellant.
          Mulholland & Associates, Donald L. Weber and Michael L. Weber, for
appellees.
                                  __________________
          {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of
Ault v. Jasko (1994),

70 Ohio St.3d 114

637 N.E.2d 870

, and the cause is remanded
to the trial court for application of Ault.
          A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ.,
concur.
          MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., dissent.
                                  __________________