Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Marques v. Lewis Mir

Marques v. Lewis Mir, 103 N.J.L. 498 (N.J. 1927)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1927-01-31
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11. For reversal — Kone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marques v. Lewis Mir. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.