Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

A. Fishman Hat Company v. Rosen

A. Fishman Hat Co. v. Rosen, 106 N.J.L. 567 (N.J. 1929)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1929-05-20
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiric, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12. For reversal — Hone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. Fishman Hat Company v. Rosen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiric, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.