Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ballinger v. City of Burlington

Ballinger v. City of Burlington, 123 N.J.L. 227 (N.J. 1939)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1939-09-22
Topic
general

*228 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKbil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14. For reversal — -Hone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ballinger v. City of Burlington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*228 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKbil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -Hone.