Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ligenza v. White Foundry Co., Inc.

Ligenza v. White Foundry Co., 137 N.J.L. 610 (N.J. 1948)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1948-09-03
Topic
general

*611 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court. For affirmance —■ The Chancellob, Ciiiee Justice, Bodine, Hehee, Waciieneeld, Bubling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Fbeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ligenza v. White Foundry Co., Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*611 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —■ The Chancellob, Ciiiee Justice, Bodine, Hehee, Waciieneeld, Bubling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Fbeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.