Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Wilson v. District Court
Wilson v. Dist. Court, 95 N.J.L. 265 (N.J. 1920)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1920-10-15
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘ For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wilson v. District Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘
For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.