Opinion · Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Behm

52 Mich. App. 119

Type: Opinion
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Date: 1974-03-07
Topic: bankruptcy

52 Mich. App. 119 (1974) 216 N.W.2d 631 PEOPLE v. BEHM PEOPLE v. PATTERSON PEOPLE v. WHITEHEAD Docket Nos. 13292, 13294, 13331.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Behm. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

52 Mich. App. 119 (1974) 216 N.W.2d 631

PEOPLE
v.
BEHM
PEOPLE
v.
PATTERSON
PEOPLE
v.
WHITEHEAD

Docket Nos. 13292, 13294, 13331.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 7, 1974.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Walter W. Turton, Prosecuting Attorney, Peter E. Deegan, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas R. Lewis, Director, Prosecuting Attorneys Appellate Service.

Stuart M. Israel, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for defendants.

*120 Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and QUINN and PETERSON, ^[*] JJ.

ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court dated December 27, 1973, in People v Whitehead, Behm, Patterson, Nos. 54942-3-4 (391 Mich 752), we have reviewed our decision in these cases as it appears in 45 Mich App 614; 207 NW2d 200 (1973), in the light of People v Adams, 389 Mich 222; 205 NW2d 415 (1973).

This review establishes that the trial court failed to instruct the jury on asportation as mandated by Adams, supra. This failure compels reversal of defendants' convictions for kidnapping.

Reversed.

NOTES

[*] Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.