Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Mergentime v. New England Telephone and Telegraph Co.

Mergentime v. New Eng. Tel. & Tel. Co., 281 N.Y. 739 (New York Court of Appeals 1939)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1939-10-20
Topic
general

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mergentime v. New England Telephone and Telegraph Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
MERGENTIMEv.NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO.,281 N.Y. 739(1939)
LEE MERGENTIME, JR., et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another,v.NEW
ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Argued October 4, 1939
Decided October 20, 1939
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, LOCKWOOD, J.Page 740
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 741
Irving W. Young, Jr.,andH.N. Wellsfor appellant.David GrobergandHarry D. Meislichfor respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: O'BRIEN, J.