Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF JAVITS, 28 N.Y.2d 923 (1971)

In the Matter of BENJAMIN A. JAVITS, an Att’y, Appellant. Ass’n OFTHE BAR OF THE CITY OF N.Y., Respondent., 28 N.Y.2d 923 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1971-01-01
Topic
general

MATTER OF JAVITS, 28 N.Y.2d 923 (1971) In the Matter of BENJAMIN A. JAVITS, an Attorney, Appellant. ASSOCIATION OFTHE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted May 3, 1971 Decided May 13, 1971 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. John G. Bonomi and Martin J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF JAVITS, 28 N.Y.2d 923 (1971). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF JAVITS,28 N.Y.2d 923(1971)
In the Matter of BENJAMIN A. JAVITS, an Attorney, Appellant. ASSOCIATION OF
THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted May 3, 1971
Decided May 13, 1971
Page 924
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.
John G. BonomiandMartin J. Linskyfor motion.James H. Halpinopposed.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division dissent is not "on a stated question of law in favor of the party taking such appeal" (CPLR5601, subd. [a], par. [i]) and that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Appellant, if so advised, may move for reargument of his appeal in the Appellate Division if he believes, as he asserts, that some of the charges sustained were found without adequate notice to him.