Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.
Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc., 64 N.Y.2d 1025 (New York Court of Appeals 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1985-04-02
- Topic
- litigation
OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant’s concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue. Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lyons v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant’s concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.