Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 62 Ohio St.3d 1508 (1992)
62 Ohio St.3d 1508
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 1992-01-01
- Topic
- general
JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 62 Ohio St.3d 1508 (1992) 583 N.E.2d 1317-1321Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED Thursday, January 29, 1992 91-1547. Highlift Equip. Co. v. Vanover.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED, 62 Ohio St.3d 1508 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED,62 Ohio St.3d 1508(1992)
583 N.E.2d 1317-1321
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1992.
Thursday, January 29, 1992
91-1547.Highlift Equip. Co. v. Vanover.Butler County, No. CA90-10-206.91-1975.Geist v. Xenia.Greene County, No. 90-CA-91.91-2104.Laughlin v. Robinson.Columbiana County, No. 90-C-47.91-2114.State v. Simmons.Lorain County, No. 90CA004949.91-2147.State v. Thompson.Cuyahoga County, No. 58972.91-2158.State v. Willman.Hamilton County, No. C-900601.
H. BROWN, J., dissents.91-2163.Andy Estates Dev. Corp. v. Bridal.Franklin County, No. 91AP-274.
MOYER, C.J., dissents.91-2168.State v. Buurma.Huron County, No. H-89-41.
RESNICK, J., not participating.91-2176.State v. Buell.Cuyahoga County, No. 57197.
WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2178.Giffin v. Overberg.Franklin County, No. 91AP-906.
WRIGHT, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. III only.91-2189.Rutledge v. Berkshire Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Geauga County, No. 90-G-1554.
SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent.91-2190.Ohio Liquor Control Comm. v. C.C. Bar's Sahara Lounge.Franklin County, No. 91AP-334.91-2192.Zangara v. Trustees of Chester Twp.Geauga County, No. 90-G-1581.
MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2202.Seredich v. Joseph Industries, Inc.Cuyahoga County, No. 59001.91-2203.State v. Bedford.Hamilton County, No. C-900412.
RESNICK, J., dissents.91-2204.DeVito v. DeVito.Licking County, No. CA-3632.91-2216.Ohio Edn. Assn. v. Southern Hills Joint Vocational Bd. of Edn.Brown County, Nos. CA90-09-008 and CA90-10-011.
SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent.91-2223.In re Adoption of Howell.Lawrence County, No. 1935.91-2225.Viox Builders, Inc. v. Smith.Franklin County, No. 91AP-381.91-2230.Koch v. McDonald's Corp.Mahoning County, No. 90 C.A. 35.
DOUGLAS, J., dissents.Page 150991-2234.Kibler v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group, Republic-Franklin Ins. Co.Richland County, No. CA-2833.
HOLMES, J., dissents and would reverse the cause and remand it for application ofState Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Rose(1991),61 Ohio St.3d 528,575 N.E.2d 459.
WRIGHT, J., dissents.91-2246.Talton v. Aeroquip Corp.Van Wert County, No. 15-91-6.
H. BROWN, J., dissents.91-2248.Smullen v. Interfact Polygraphs, Inc.CuyahogaCounty, No. 58722.
MOYER, C.J., HOLMES and H. BROWN, JJ., dissent.91-2269.Fisher v. Hall.Butler County, No. CA90-11-225.91-2278.Keil v. Keil.Ottawa County, No. 90-OT-043.
RESNICK, J., not participating.91-2288.Thomas v. CC S Restaurants, Inc.Erie County, No. E-90-40.
HOLMES, J., dissents.