Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MOTION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1455 (1994)

MOTION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1455 (1994), 70 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 1994)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1994-01-01
Topic: general

MOTION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1455 (1994) 639 N.E.2d 792-796Supreme Court of Ohio. 1994. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, September 28, 1994 93-1887. Kokitka v. Ford Motor Co. Cuyahoga County, No. 62410.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1455 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOTION DOCKET,70 Ohio St.3d 1455(1994)

639 N.E.2d 792-796

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1994.

MOTION DOCKET

Wednesday, September 28, 1994

93-1887.Kokitka v. Ford Motor Co.Cuyahoga County, No. 62410. On motion for admissionpro hac viceof Lawrence C. Marshall. Motion granted.93-2476.Pitts v. Mobile Tank Car Serv., Inc.CuyahogaCounty, Nos. 62927, 62928 and 62929. On motion for leave to file additional supplement. Motion granted.93-2494.State v. King.Cuyahoga County, Nos. 63821 and 63822. On request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Request denied.94-1133.State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Health Developmental Disabilities.Cuyahoga County, No. 66315. On motion to strike. Motion granted.

MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

Page 145694-1467.State v. Anderson.Cuyahoga County, Nos. 65378 and 65379. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

WRIGHT, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.94-1821.State v. Witt.Cuyahoga County, No. 61173. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

WRIGHT, J., dissents.94-1825.State v. Myles.Hamilton County, No. C-930621. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.Sua sponte, the discretionary appeal is denied.94-1847.State v. Rogers.Adams County, No. 93CA548. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.94-1869.Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Tracy. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 92-G-1380. On motion for admissionpro hac viceby Kevin H. Giordano, Esq. Motion granted.94-1873.State v. Reliford.Hamilton County, Nos. C-920857 and C-920858. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.94-1889.State v. Garrod.Auglaize County, No. 2-93-23. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.94-1898.State v. Vultee.Montgomery County, No. 13581. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

MOYER, C.J., dissents.94-1996.State ex rel. Morris v. Macedonia City Council. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ be, and the same is hereby, granted, and the following expedited schedule is set for the presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before October 3, 1994; relator shall file his brief on or before October 6, 1994; and respondents shall file their brief(s) on or before October 11, 1994.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would grant a peremptory writ.