Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. May v. Cissell

State ex rel. May v. Cissell, 73 Ohio St. 3d 46 (Ohio 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Date
1995-08-09
Topic
general

*47The judgments of the court of appeals dismissing the complaints for writs of mandamus are affirmed on the basis that appellant possesses an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to correct the trial court records via App.R. 9(E). See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 592, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1194-1195, and cases cited therein. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. May v. Cissell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at
73 Ohio St.3d 46 
.]




THE STATE EX REL. MAY, APPELLANT, v. CISSELL, CLERK, ET AL., APPELLEES.
                [Cite as State ex rel. May v. Cissell,
1995-Ohio-29 
.]
Mandamus to compel correction of trial court records—Writ denied when adequate
        remedy in the ordinary cause of law via App.R. 9(E) exists.
(Nos. 95-546 and 95-547—Submitted June 21, 1995—Decided August 9, 1995.)
  APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, Nos. C-940988 and
                                        C-941043.
                                  __________________
        Morris May, pro se.
        Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J.
Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgments of the court of appeals dismissing the complaints for
writs of mandamus are affirmed on the basis that appellant possesses an adequate
remedy in the ordinary course of law to correct the trial court records via App.R.
9(E). See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1995),
70 Ohio St.3d 587 
, 592,
639 N.E.2d 89 
, 1194-1195, and cases cited therein.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and
COOK, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________