Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985)
STATE OF Or., Respondent, v. DARRELL DEAN COX, Appellant.(Cases Consolidated), 693 P.2d 1320 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1985-03-19
- Topic
- general
STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985) 693 P.2d 1320 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DARRELL DEAN COX, Appellant.(Cases Consolidated) 10-82-00339, 10-82-00340, 10-82-05485, 10-83-02744;CA A29430 (Control), A29431, A29432, A29433Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted December 20, 1984 Convictions affirmed, sentences vacated, remanded forresentencing January 16, 1985Reconsideration denied February 22, 1985Petition for review denied March 19, 1985 (298 Or. 822) Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County. Roland K.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. COX, 71 Or. App. 651 (1985). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Roland K. Rodman, Judge.
Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.Page 652
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.Page 653