Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

PICRAY v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 325 Or. 279 (1997)

David PICRAY, Respondent on Rev., v. Sec’y OF STATE, Petitioner onReview., 936 P.2d 974 (Or. 1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1997-04-29
Topic
general

PICRAY v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 325 Or. 279 (1997) 936 P.2d 974 David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner onReview. CA A85293; SC S43537Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted January 17, 1997 Decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed by an equally divided court;Order of the Secretary of State reversed April 29, 1997 On review from the Court of Appeals.[fn*] [fn*] Judicial review from the Secretary of State. 140 Or. App. 592,916 P.2d 324 (1996).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PICRAY v. SECRETARY OF STATE, 325 Or. 279 (1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PICRAY v. SECRETARY OF STATE,325 Or. 279(1997)
936 P.2d 974
David PICRAY,Respondent on Review,v. SECRETARY OF STATE,Petitioner on
Review.
CA A85293; SC S43537
Oregon Supreme Court.
Argued and submitted January 17, 1997
Decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed by an equally divided court;
Order of the Secretary of State reversed April 29, 1997
On review from the Court of Appeals.fn*
Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.fn**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.Page 280
  1. Judicial review from the Secretary of State.140 Or. App. 592,916 P.2d 324(1996). ↩
  2. Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. ↩