Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.

Munters Corp. v. Matsui Am., Inc., 498 U.S. 1016 (1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-12-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • observing that “Congress’ purpose in enacting § 1346 was to restore the mail fraud statute to its pre- McNally position”
  • "Park 'N Fly does not preclude consideration of a mark’s strength for purposes of determining the likelihood of confusion.”
  • “A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney’s failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritoriousf.]”
  • "A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney's failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritorious[.]"
  • denying petition for writ of certiorari
  • property interest in medical license

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
67 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.