Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Efamol, Ltd. v. United States
Efamol, Ltd. v. United States, 506 U.S. 940 (1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-10-19
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- hiring of younger employee because of changed business circumstances "does not mean that [the defendant] replaced [the plaintiff] in any sense relevant to inferring age-based discrimination”
- upholding a verdict of $350,000 for emotional distress damages flowing from the employer-defendant’s violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act
- “Spreading the former duties of a terminated employee among the remaining employees does not constitute replacement.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Efamol, Ltd. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 95 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.