Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pitsch v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission
Pitsch v. Mich. Att’y Grievance Comm’n, 517 U.S. 1172 (1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-04-29
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- “[a]t a minimum, ... the petitioner during direct appeal must have explicitly referred the state courts to the United States Constitution or federal case law”
- “At minimum, though, the petitioner during direct appeal must have explicitly referred the state courts to the United States Constitution or federal case law.”
- ‘Were protestation of innocence the only prerequisite to application of this exception, we fear that actual innocence would become a gateway forever open to habeas petitioners’ defaulted claims.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pitsch v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 32 opinions
Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.