Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President
Armstrong v. Exec. Off. of the President, 520 U.S. 1239 (1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-05-27
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
How later courts describe this case
- holding § 440(a) applicable to pending petitions because “unlike situations where retro-activity would affect pre-existing rights, withdrawal of jurisdiction, although realistically disrupting settled expectations, does not preserve pending litigation”
- assuming that materiality is a matter for the jury, reversal inappropriate because error was harmless
- presenting question whether court of appeals is required to raise procedural default
- testimony from female employees concerning sexual relationship with defendant admissible pursuant to Rule 404(b
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 64 opinions
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.