Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court

Garber v. L.A. Mun. Court, 522 U.S. 935 (1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-10-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that a union “cannot acquiesce in a company’s prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . .”
  • stating that where the alleged retaliation “occurs prior to the filing of a charge and the employee fails to allege the retaliatory act or a retaliation claim in the subsequent charge, the retaliatory act ordinarily will not reasonably relate to the charge”
  • the seventeen-year-old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck, drove him to a secluded area, and shot him three times in the head
  • defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • defendant kidnapped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • The seventeen year old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head
  • a plaintiff may seek judicial consideration of discrimination claims not identified in EEOC charge if omitted claims are reasonably related to the allegations in the charge
  • testimony of debtor as to debts owed

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
106 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.