Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas, 528 U.S. 1161 (2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2000-02-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
  • “Although it uses the label ‘plus,’ the First Circuit’s ‘pretext plus’ standard does not necessarily require the introduction of additional evidence beyond that required to show pretext.”
  • the stereotypic assumption that "women are not aggressive" along with other “more subtle cognitive phenomena” may infect decision-making
  • at the third stage of the McDonnell Douglas framework "the ultimate burden is on the plaintiff to persuade the trier of fact that she has been treated differently because of [a protected characteristic]”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
55 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.